Fight against the shifting paradigm.

Recently, England has voted to separate from the European Union. Most young voters opted to remain, but the conservative vote leaned towards separation. Personally, I view this as resistance against the new paradigm, where those who resist change uphold the status quo are conservatives. They aim to reintroduce controlling politics for specific groups and actively oppose the idea of belonging to humanity as a whole. Their politics of group dominance and instilling fear of insecurity among ordinary individuals have hindered human progress. I believe all wars are ultimately linked to such politics of control and a lack of belief in humanity as a unified whole.

If you closely examine old philosophies, their purpose was often to create exclusive groups with a strong sense of belonging. Although times have been changing, progress has often been suppressed, as seen in this referendum, by powerful politics that prioritize group allegiance. The demographics of Western countries reflect this reality. These nations are melting pots where diverse people seek refuge due to the promise of equal human rights, which they often lack in their countries of origin. Any society that grants special treatment to some while excluding others can rightly be labeled as racist or prejudiced.

Certain segments of the population will always adhere to conservatism due to its old-style security. Strength in numbers has been the foundation of human politics for thousands of years, regardless of individual security, even within belonging groups. At its core lies the concept of individual self-preservation. While effective, group politics often intervene and divide people, yet individuals still seek security in numbers among like-minded individuals.

Politically, a group can be successful, but internal and external conflicts inevitably lead to further divisions. Human spirituality and a sense of belonging to humanity as a whole are the solutions to our conflicts and divisions. Throughout history, populations and individuals have sought security in numbers, yet this approach has never fully succeeded. Today, all technological and related advancements emphasize the importance of belonging to humanity as a whole. Global warming and threats from infectious diseases underscore the necessity for humanity to unite. The internet and cell phones are gifts that enable humanity to evolve to the next level, promoting a sense of belonging to humanity as a whole with equal human rights—a concept I refer to as the new paradigm.

Conservative populations vehemently oppose these changes, but they are fighting a losing battle because philosophies advocating special treatment fail when it comes to equal human rights. Today, one cannot assert superiority based on religion—be it Christian versus Muslim—or nationality—such as Canadian versus Pakistani. Similarly, one cannot claim superiority based on skin color, gender, or sexuality; those days are over amidst the winds of change. Even supreme courts worldwide are beginning to reject special treatments as they contradict principles of justice.

Whether it’s Malala, Jo Cox, or the victims of the gay club killings, they all suffer due to the extremes of conservatism, which preach and practice racism and prejudice. Politically, these can be labeled as acts of certain terror groups, but extremism exists within all human populations. In times of change, people either fight to maintain the status quo or push for extreme change. As individuals, it’s our duty to understand these shifts, much like a CEO who anticipates future trends, so we can choose to stand for equal human rights for all—a concept I call the new paradigm.

I may not know what you know, and similarly, you may not know what I know. Assuming you know everything I know could be incorrect, especially when you presume your knowledge surpasses mine.

We should all make space for and respect each other’s knowledge so that humanity can advance and progress, rather than demeaning each other or worse, spiritually regressing.

Imagine how far humanity could advance if we all identified first and foremost with humanity as a whole, rather than dividing ourselves by races, genders, packs, gangs, groups, communities, nations, or religions. Ironically, I learned this from a religious preacher named Molaana Ajmal a long time ago. He said (and I quote), “If I give you a newspaper and ask you to put your finger through it without tearing the paper, how would you do it?” Then he explained: “First, use a pin to make several holes, then poke your finger through—it won’t tear the paper.”

Mind you, he was very conservative yet wise at the same time. He may not have used this knowledge in the same context as I am using it, but wisdom is wisdom; you can’t deny its power. When changes come, if we don’t adapt with the times or try to change too quickly, our paper will rip. All our wars and individual killings are linked to our politics of conservatism and liberalism—they have nothing to do with spirituality. The name of God has been liberally invoked in our religious wars, yet they have all been political conflicts.

If changes occur faster than we can cope, they can cause problems instead of being beneficial. Adapting to change requires a rhythm and a suitable pace for each of us. If we individually become CEOs of our own lives, we would understand and adjust to these changes. Otherwise, there will always be passionate people who hijack the commitment to become extremists. They wholeheartedly believe they are following the spiritual teachings of religions, yet without compassion, forgiveness, sacrifice, and love, religion becomes merely a political system.

Humanity is plagued by social, political, and spiritual issues, which I believe hold us back. In today’s interconnected world, we have the opportunity to overcome our security-related problems. I can only imagine how far we could advance without wars and prejudice. Imagine if, millions of years ago, we had identified primarily with humanity instead of forming exclusive groups—where would we be today? Our group mentality is akin to a gang with a narrow worldview. Group security is unattainable in the face of infectious diseases and global warming. If poverty and starvation kill people in certain regions, they have the right to migrate to places where they can survive. In Islam, it is said that if your neighbor sleeps hungry, your food and sleep are not kosher for you. Look at the oil-producing countries in Africa and others suffering from various problems—same religion, even the same sect, yet significant disparities exist. There’s much preaching but little practical action. The same applies to Donald Trump, who advocates building a wall. Humanity is interconnected, and in the new paradigm, this is an undeniable fact—we must all eventually adapt to it. Global warming will bring a new wave of refugees; how will people like him respond to that? I’m not a socialist, but when it comes to reality, it may be bitter, but it cannot be denied.

Politically, conservatives have been labeling anyone who advocates for others as socialists, thereby politicizing and countering spiritual principles. I find this particularly troubling, considering that many religious individuals align themselves with conservative politics, despite the fact that all religions teach and preach principles of social responsibility. They advocate congregating and assisting the less fortunate. However, the politics of security have undermined our actual security and spirituality, both in this life and beyond.

I believe humans are most valuable to God during their lives on Earth. The essence of spirituality lies in this physical world, not in the afterlife. Therefore, killing in the name of God or advocating for walls is not spiritually acceptable; it goes against the essence of spirituality by destroying a living entity, thereby depriving God and loved ones of their rightful place. Just look at the impact of the removal of the Berlin Wall on Germany. If it had been detrimental, they would not have welcomed so many refugees. I commend their spiritual strength.

Those who believe their group is superior to others, whether based on nationalism, religion, skin color, or sexual orientation, can be considered racist and prejudiced in today’s diverse world. In a melting pot society, distinctions like white and black are no longer as clear-cut. Belief in one’s cause can lead to extremism or prejudice, moving individuals away from moderation

If you are taught superiority, it can often lead to an inferiority complex in the real world, especially with shifting demographics. The world population is evolving, and so too should our belief systems. If a white American believes America is inherently a white nation, thereby making everyone else an immigrant, it requires a deeper examination. Even the native populations migrated across Beringia to reach North America. Genetically, if we delve deep enough, we may find we all have roots in Africa, so distinctions based on race, gender, nationality, or religion must take a back seat to the principle of equal human rights. Understand this: equal human rights represent the new paradigm, almost akin to a universal religion.

People need to grasp the dynamics and needs of society. Change should be approached like starting a workout, beginning with one pound and working up to a hundred, or gently poking a pin through paper to avoid tearing it. If some societies do not meet certain standards, reflect on the history of your own society—it has also progressed over time. The challenge lies in some wanting rapid change while others resist any change at all. Humanity must delve deeply, persevere, and continue to progress to fulfill its true potential as intended by God. We must utilize our intellect to advance rather than stagnate or regress.

When humanity collaborates, remarkable achievements occur, such as space stations and the internet. Yet, the full impact of these advancements has yet to be fully realized. As time progresses, we will understand how our scientific knowledge aligns with spirituality—from connecting as cells of humanity or God to optimizing function, to addressing global challenges like Ebola and climate change, benefiting each individual.

Individual connections among people can profoundly influence group dynamics. Everything can change if individuals look beyond their immediate group affiliations. With personal justice, ethics, and morals, we should all be willing to recognize and speak out against injustices committed by our own groups, be they atrocities or spiritual crimes against humanity.

Propaganda is one thing, but these days, with cell phones in everyone’s hands, real-life police departments all over the world are facing problems as all war crimes are broadcasted. People who commit crimes in the name of security often have distorted views of life, and unfortunately, it’s not their fault. It’s the education they have received from the politics of their belonging groups. As long as these groups use an individual’s sense of belonging and vulnerabilities for political gains, achieving peace will always be problematic, regardless of walls, whether they are for financial security or otherwise.

There are always some problems, akin to a crime rate that cannot be eliminated even with ample resources. If you seek a perfectly flawless life, you may fall victim to mental health issues because such a pursuit guarantees perpetual dissatisfaction. Seeking contentment should be a goal, especially for mortal individuals. Living in an imperfect world with a degree of flexibility can make life’s journey livable, but never stop poking and creating holes to reach a point where you can put your finger through. Evolution is one of the meanings of human life because we strive to achieve the potential that God intended for us. Logically, there are no limits for the human individual—from the creation of new brain neurons to self-repair and regeneration abilities, from building muscle in the human body to emotional intelligence growth, and to the virtues like compassion, forgiveness, sacrifice, and love—all point towards this spiritual potential.

This potential has often been demonized and blocked by religious and political teachings that aim to keep individuals inferior and subservient to their belonging groups. Learn to be the CEO of your life, taking personal responsibilities and establishing a personal justice system that allows you to live a mortal life without fear, guiding you to reach the heights of that potential where you can understand and maintain the right-side-up triangle.

Are you proud to be drunk on the sense of belonging?

Several of our social problems are connected to an out-of-control sense of belonging. Being a proud “redneck” is a problem many rednecks don’t even acknowledge. If someone is proud of being a redneck, they are intoxicated by an excessive sense of belonging. A bully has a strong need to impress others, which is also tied to this sense of belonging, to the point it can become a mental health issue where they disregard the harm they inflict on the people whose approval they seek.

If you can’t balance your sense of belonging with your sense of being a free individual, you are a weak person brainwashed by the knowledge provided by your belonging groups. You were not created by God to be this way. All human knowledge is beneficial until an individual starts to feel superior to others.

There are all kinds of prejudice around. You could be an educated person who thinks those less educated are inferior. You could be brainwashed by your belonging groups—nations, races, or religions—that preach they are superior, and since you are part of them, you believe you are better regardless of your character. You could be gender-biased, thinking you are stronger and thus superior. Spiritually, this is all wrong because we are all connected as an organism and are most valuable when we are practically useful to humanity.

I am an individualist, but I draw my lines with my freedom itself because I know I can’t function alone as a cell. As an intricate component of the body, I know my place, and spiritually, I feel it’s my duty to reciprocate while I am alive.

Whenever you feel you are better than others for any reason, you need to start thinking deeply. Feelings are strongly connected with thinking, and unfortunately, our knowledge and wisdom providers don’t realize how much damage they cause to humanity by turning us against each other. People fight over how to pray to God and kill someone over selling beef, yet practically, nothing is done for the less fortunate. Are they really pleasing God? I personally would not want to believe in a God who is pleased by human suffering. There is nothing spiritual in these kinds of fights and prejudice-related wars. They are all political wars, with God’s name and individuals’ religious convictions used by leaders to gain power and control. I believe in individual education so that one can see through the atrocities of the politics of belonging.

From terror attacks to sitting behind drone control boards, we are all individuals making decisions with our free will to join the causes of our belonging groups. I compare this to drunk driving—you make a choice to drive after drinking, just as you decide to join a cause. The blame lies on the individual.

How vulnerable are you? Do you believe in shouldering your responsibilities or hide behind excuses like “I have to do my job,” just like religious people hide behind God and the Devil to commit spiritual crimes? One must understand why each of us has been blessed with free will by God. After your umbilical cord has been cut, you take pride in being an individual, but learning the responsibilities that come with free will is most important. You can choose a career that does not involve killing other human beings because, even if they belong to other groups, they are still human. If you feel drunk, even if it’s on the alcohol of God, it’s still your responsibility to shoulder it. You can’t choose to kill in the name of God, especially if you have been influenced by politically charged religions.

The spiritual part of every religion starts with compassion, forgiveness, sacrifice, and love. If your religion takes you away from these jewels or fundamentals of spirituality, you are following a political group that leads you further from spirituality. Even if you have been promised heaven, that promise has nothing to do with spirituality. Without spirituality, there is no heaven—not in this life, nor the afterlife. The same goes for individuals who think their nation is the most important; you have been taught prejudice. Even if they say prejudice is bad on the surface, it’s all about practical living. To understand prejudice without the bias of belonging to a group, look at it as a spiritual being. If you have passed the genetic test of being a human, pass the spiritual test as well. Stand against prejudice, be equal to all, and advocate for equal human rights for everyone. This will bring you to the spiritual world in this life. And no, I am not promising anything in the afterlife because your living years matter the most. No one can say for certain what happens after death—there are several theories and religious beliefs—but one thing is for sure: you can only do good things practically while you are alive.

The sink hole.

 Who are you going to call when you feel a need to fill the spiritual void within you?

Many of us turn to religious teachings, but religious leaders often make us feel so inferior that we lose our sense of self in the bigger picture. Logically, it is the individual who must search within for the answers. You must first call upon yourself before following ancient doctrines. Your personal void can swallow you whole—psychologically, emotionally, physically, and spiritually. If you don’t come to terms with your mortality, you will always be a victim of fear and stress, regardless of how religious you are.

Imagine you are standing on what you think is solid ground and notice a small hole. Upon closer inspection, you realize it is the largest sinkhole you have ever seen, revealing that the ground you thought was solid is not so solid after all. If you live in a city, you might call the authorities about a pothole, let alone a sinkhole. But the hole I’m talking about is the one created by our mortality.

This thought was inspired by the Ottawa sinkhole. They poured in six hundred cement trucks to fill it, yet the job wasn’t done. Then, the news of terror attacks overshadowed this event. So, I want to discuss individual responsibilities and the metaphorical sinkhole we each face.

Understanding the importance of free will and the responsibilities it brings is crucial. I urge everyone to ask themselves: How big is your spiritual sinkhole? How much do you fear it, and what have you done to combat that fear?

As human beings, no matter how much we put into that hole, it remains unfilled. Despite our advancements, we are not out of the woods. While we have extended life expectancy and improved its quality, mortality remains as inevitable as ever.

Being mortal is like standing on ground that you wish were solid, but you can’t gain full control over it. The structure of life is designed this way, so you must plan your life accordingly. You can’t call upon a group of people, gurus, religious leaders, or even doctors to fill this sinkhole, as they, too, stand on the same ground. A doctor might be called for a near-death individual, but the doctor is also mortal. So, who should we call?

If you are an atheist, you might not understand the placebo effect or the benefits of faith. But if you believe in something, you might find comfort in prayer. This comfort, however, varies from person to person. When the time comes to face mortality, having faith can ease your fears, regardless of the unknown. I personally choose to believe, allowing me to walk on this unstable ground without fear. Instead of worrying about who will fill my spiritual sinkhole, I focus on adding more happy days to my temporary life by taking personal responsibility and not stressing over uncontrollable things.

Do you surrender yourself to your belonging group or religion because of deep-seated insecurities? If so, when will you take ownership of your free will and responsibilities? Understanding your mortality and having a belief system can help you face real fears. Attending a mosque, church, or temple won’t eliminate your fears unless you truly believe you are a part of God. If you choose to live as an egotistical, permanent entity, you will sacrifice your happiness.

We must make the best use of our knowledge. If our knowledge robs us of life’s quality, it’s our duty to fix this by thinking for ourselves. Mortality is a fact—you can fear it and live a diminished life, or embrace real faith to live fearlessly.

Accepting mortality and working as part of God can secure even the most insecure individual, guiding them toward a spiritual path. Insecurities often stem from a sense of belonging to divisive groups that preach the superiority of one group over another, distancing humanity from the divine.

A mortal’s security and dignity are strongly linked to understanding their connection to the divine. Recognizing this can fill the spiritual sinkhole that otherwise drains life, causing stress-related illnesses, both psychological and physical. These illnesses not only lead to minor societal crimes but also major spiritual crimes like wars driven by prejudice and racism.

Political and fear-based divisions hinder humanity’s unity. Conservative political parties and terror organizations resist this unity to maintain their existence. However, advancements like the internet, the space station, and governments enforcing equal human rights signal changes toward global unity.

Terror attacks, like the one on a gay nightclub, highlight the need for educating young adults. Individuals with a strong self-identity and connection to the divine will respect equal human rights. Whether black in a predominantly white country, Muslim in a Christian-majority society, or gay in a straight community, all are protected by the law of equal human rights, prohibiting discrimination.

Prejudiced and discriminatory teachings are freely given to the younger generation, making it hard for them to filter out the political biases of belonging groups. Even adults struggle to take individual responsibility and judge according to modern laws.

A belief system should be free of political biases and purely spiritual, encompassing all humanity. The spiritual world, including life after death, is attained through good deeds in life. Practical help to humanity constitutes real good deeds, beyond mere worship.

Is it God’s will or human free will? It’s time to ask this difficult question. I believe it is human politics that drives actions, not divine will. Religious contradictions abound—religious people enforce harsh punishments, yet believe nothing moves without God’s will.

Historical and current spiritual crimes, such as those against aboriginal children, show how God’s name is used for political purposes. God provides free oxygen for human life, allowing divine expression. Spirituality aligns human and divine will, but politics driven by greed and power disrupt this balance.

Living temporarily fosters spirituality, while a belief in eternal life can skew life choices. Balance is key, and individuals must use free will wisely and justly. Taking responsibility for our actions might require standing against our own groups, prioritizing equal human rights over group belonging. Humanity’s unity is crucial for future advancement, and standing aside means being left behind.

Justice systems worldwide are based on free will. Interestingly, religious societies have harsher laws yet believe in divine determinism. Religious wars, fought with passion, lack humanity. Corporal punishment for conformity contradicts the belief in divine will.

Spiritual crimes against aboriginal children and the misuse of God for political gain illustrate how empires have controlled uneducated masses. Yet, God provides oxygen for human life, emphasizing divine expression through human will. In spirituality, human and divine will align, but human politics of greed and power disrupt this balance.

Living temporarily fosters spirituality, while a belief in eternal life can skew life choices. Balance is key, and individuals must use free will wisely and justly. Taking responsibility for our actions might require standing against our own groups, prioritizing equal human rights over group belonging. Humanity’s unity is crucial for future advancement, and standing aside means being left behind.

Justice systems worldwide are based on free will. Interestingly, religious societies have harsher laws yet believe in divine determinism. Religious wars, fought with passion, lack humanity. Corporal punishment for conformity contradicts the belief in divine will.

As individuals, we must ask why we believe we are right and others are wrong. Education plays a fundamental role; flawed education based on group belonging hinders critical thinking. Those who think outside the box are labeled traitors, but relating to all humanity is essential for spiritual growth.

Using free will responsibly means making choices for the greater good of humanity. If you don’t play your cards freely, you disservice yourself, humanity, and God.

Taking responsibility may require standing against your own groups. Choosing equal human rights over group belonging is crucial for humanity’s progress. The world is changing, with moderate views gaining ground over extremism.

All justice systems are based on free will. In religious societies, laws are harsher despite the belief in divine determinism. Religious wars lack humanity, and corporal punishment contradicts the belief in divine will.

Spiritual crimes, like those against aboriginal children, show how God’s name is used for political gain. Empires have controlled uneducated masses through religion. Yet, God provides oxygen for life, emphasizing divine expression through human will. Spirituality aligns human and divine will, but human politics of greed and power disrupt this balance.

Living temporarily fosters spirituality, while a belief in eternal life can skew life choices. Balance is key, and individuals must use free will wisely and justly. Taking responsibility for our actions might require standing against our own groups, prioritizing equal human rights over group belonging. Humanity’s unity is crucial for future advancement, and standing aside means being left behind.

Justice systems worldwide are based on free will. Interestingly, religious societies have harsher laws yet believe in divine determinism. Religious wars, fought with passion, lack humanity. Corporal punishment for conformity contradicts the belief in divine will.

As individuals, we must ask why we believe we are right and others are wrong. Education plays a fundamental role; flawed education based on group belonging hinders critical thinking. Those who think outside the box are labeled traitors, but relating to all humanity is essential for spiritual growth.

Using free will responsibly means making choices for the greater good of humanity. If you don’t play your cards freely, you disservice yourself, humanity, and God.

Taking responsibility may require standing against your own groups. Choosing equal human rights over group belonging is crucial for humanity’s progress. The world is changing, with moderate views gaining ground over extremism.

All justice systems are based on free will. In religious societies, laws are harsher despite the belief in divine determinism. Religious wars lack humanity, and corporal punishment contradicts the belief in divine will.

God’s will and human will are intertwined in spirituality, but politics driven by greed, insecurity, and power disrupt this balance. Live temporarily to foster spirituality; thinking you will live forever changes your life choices. Balance is key; use free will wisely and justly.

Taking responsibility for our actions may require standing against our own groups, prioritizing equal human rights over group belonging. Humanity’s unity is crucial for future advancement, and standing aside means being left behind. The world is changing, and moderate views are gaining ground over extremism.

Justice systems worldwide are based on free will. Interestingly, religious societies have harsher laws despite believing in divine determinism. Religious wars lack humanity, and corporal punishment contradicts the belief in divine will.

Spiritual crimes, like those against aboriginal children, show how God’s name is used for political gain. Empires have controlled uneducated masses through religion. Yet, God provides oxygen for life, emphasizing divine expression through human will. Spirituality aligns human and divine will, but human politics of greed and power disrupt this balance.

Living temporarily fosters spirituality, while a belief in eternal life can skew life choices. Balance is key, and individuals must use free will wisely and justly. Taking responsibility for our actions might require standing against our own groups, prioritizing equal human rights over group belonging. Humanity’s unity is crucial for future advancement, and standing aside means being left behind.

Justice systems worldwide are based on free will. Interestingly, religious societies have harsher laws despite believing in divine determinism. Religious wars lack humanity, and corporal punishment contradicts the belief in divine will.

We must ask why we believe we are right and others are wrong. Education plays a fundamental role; flawed education based on group belonging hinders critical thinking. Those who think outside the box are labeled traitors, but relating to all humanity is essential for spiritual growth.

Using free will responsibly means making choices for the greater good of humanity. If you don’t play your cards freely, you disservice yourself, humanity, and God.

Taking responsibility may require standing against your own groups. Choosing equal human rights over group belonging is crucial for humanity’s progress. The world is changing, with moderate views gaining ground over extremism.

All justice systems are based on free will. In religious societies, laws are harsher despite the belief in divine determinism. Religious wars lack humanity, and corporal punishment contradicts the belief in divine will.

CEO, the essence of God and the foundation of humanity.

Muhammad Ali has just passed away, and I want to pay my respects to his remarkable life by starting this post with one of his quotes that aligns perfectly with my message:

“We all have the same God; we just serve Him differently. Rivers, lakes, ponds, streams, oceans all have different names, but they all contain water. So do religions have names, and they all contain truth, expressed in different ways, forms, and times. It doesn’t matter whether you are a Muslim, a Christian, or a Jew. When you believe in God, you should believe that all people are part of one family. If you love God, you can’t love only some of His children.”
— Muhammad Ali

One of my core themes is the importance of belonging to the whole of humanity rather than just a specific group of people.

I often use the human body as a metaphor for humanity. The body functions best when all parts work together. Imagine if the brain told other body parts, “Without me, you can’t function,” and the heart replied, “If I don’t supply oxygen and nutrient-rich blood, you wouldn’t function at all.” The lungs might say, “Wait a minute, I provide the oxygen,” while the liver could claim, “If I don’t clean up your mess, none of you would function.” The kidneys would also argue for their role in cleaning, and the colon might loudly declare, “You’re all full of it! Without me providing nutrients, you’d all be dead.” The body functions best, or at all, only when everyone works together. Despite any chaos, the body needs the efforts of every organ. If even one part doesn’t work properly, the body is diseased. Similarly, humanity is diseased by our stubborn, extreme, and misplaced political sense of belonging.

The foundation of my philosophy rests on humans, God, and the Devil. God and the Devil are parts of the human experience, inseparable from us. If you try to separate them, it doesn’t work logically. Human prayers can’t materialize without humans. Considering God and the Devil as the good and bad sides of humanity, when removed, humanity is neutral but still exists. However, if you remove humanity, both the good and bad disappear. Even if God and the Devil exist beyond humanity, their value or harm depends on human existence. Humans feel the pain of harm and the joy of God’s blessings.

God and the Devil came into existence through human experiences. Awareness of good and bad is the foundation of these entities. Whether God or the Devil came before or after humanity, no one can say for sure. Our understanding is limited, likely for a long time. This limitation explains why there are so many belief systems and why humanity struggles to agree. Politically charged senses of belonging insist on belief systems where the ordinary human is insignificant, allowing easy control. Such thinking empowers governing authorities, turning belief systems into political tools rather than spiritual guides. Compassion, forgiveness, sacrifice, love, and equal human rights should be the top priorities of all belief systems. Yet, belief systems often lead to the killing of innocents in God’s name with fervor.

This is why some atheists say that God’s existence hangs by a thin thread, breakable by new scientific discoveries. Personally, I believe in God because it makes sense to believe in ourselves and our dual nature. Humans commit evil deeds, but they also perform good deeds. It’s a matter of free will and choice, with each person acting as the CEO of their life.

If you believe you are insignificant, you belittle yourself, either due to the politics of your group or deep personal insecurities. You might be unable to question your group’s rules, especially when they are said to be God’s orders. If your group doesn’t accept others as part of humanity and preaches religious politics devoid of spirituality, it’s not a path toward equal human rights. Without equal human rights, it’s just a divisive political system stripping religions of spirituality. We can’t fathom the death toll and individual suffering caused by religious extremism. Throughout history, innocent people have been killed in God’s name. I can’t understand why God would need any kind of sacrifice, let alone human sacrifice, to be pleased. If you are spiritually aware, you wouldn’t want something or someone killed for you.

If education can’t change this, at least you can see yourself as a spiritual being by believing in equal human rights with a personal sense of justice. Educating yourself makes you aware of your direct relationship with God and your duty of reciprocation. Contributing to humanity is actually a duty of reciprocation, not something owed by everyone, including God. From breathing free air to enjoying life’s bounties and feeling good about yourself in your mortal life, these matter most. Doing good deeds out of greed for heaven or fear of hell isn’t right; it’s about responsibility and reciprocation.

If we all start believing that each human is insignificant in the grand scheme, our philosophy is flawed, at least in my view. It may seem that way because there are so many of us, but we are the DNA of the big picture. If all humans were gone, would God or the Devil matter, and to whom? Logically, God and the Devil don’t make sense without humanity.

The holy picture rests on the foundation of spirituality and physicality simultaneously. Choosing one over the other leaves you with an incomplete half. Without physicality, the spiritual world means nothing to humanity because prayers must be realized physically in the living world. If you pray for someone to go to heaven or be saved from hell, you must be there to witness whether your prayers are fulfilled. In living life, you can see when someone chooses to do good; they fulfill someone’s prayers physically. Helping someone in difficult times, assisting a blind person across the street, or giving someone a job—these are practical helps to humanity. Banging your head or bowing down in obedience, wearing a cross or other religious symbols—these actions mean less to God than real, practical help to those in need.

The purpose of a belief system is to help individuals or creatures live better lives. If a belief system can create better individuals, it can help humanity, and thus God. Though I may focus on the individual, my intention is about humanity, one person at a time. Each of us has the ability to use free will and the responsibility for our actions. Our justice systems are founded on individual responsibility, which is complex given the over two hundred countries, each with its justice systems, constitutions, and religions. This diversity creates vast differences, compounded by traditions, customs, and political senses of belonging. These problems have persisted for thousands of years and may continue unless we evolve individually to become CEOs of our lives, belonging to humanity as a whole instead of just a group.

Growing up in divided societies with strong senses of belonging to specific groups breeds chaos and wars. Does God want human suffering? I don’t think so. No one chooses to suffer. I believe God lives through humanity. Am I saying God doesn’t have a choice? No, but the free will granted by God causes troubles. It’s our responsibility to choose not to cause pain and chaos and to take responsibility for our actions, one person at a time, so we can push our groups to adopt and accept humanity and God as a whole.

When I judge a competition, I’ve never been instructed to favor a competitor from my province or to mark down someone based on gender, sexual preferences, or nationality. The best athlete should win, regardless of who they are—that’s my personal justice system. But as humanity, what have we been doing? Our sense of belonging politics has made us lose our personal sense of justice. We favor our race, nations, religions, even our gender and sports teams, wanting to win regardless of merit. The sense of right judgment is lost in the politics of belonging. Just ask a sports fan—they always want their team to win, regardless of performance.

We are not fair individually, let alone as groups, races, nations, or religions. Politicians exploit this, leading to wars and charging individuals to commit spiritual crimes against others with songs and slogans of belonging. This stems from the education we receive. As I said, if the world around you is banging its head against the wall, it doesn’t make it right. You must judge with your personal justice system, which you are born with. Following ancestral patterns won’t change outcomes. You have more responsibility than you might believe. You are the essence of God and the foundation of humanity. If you don’t change and become a CEO, spirituality will continue to suffer under political religions. We’ll all pay the price—just look at our conflicts and the suffering on both sides.

There’s a verse from a poem whose author I don’t remember, so I’ll say Author Unknown:

“Na khudaa he milaa na visallay sunam
Na ither kay rahay na uther kay rahay.”

It translates to: “I did not get God, nor did I get to see my love. I lost from both sides.”

Free will pushes individuals to seek more knowledge to avoid such predicaments. I don’t mean for individuals to lose faith; my writing aims to raise awareness of individual responsibilities, even in matters of faith. These examples are meant to strengthen faith, not weaken it. I use logic but understand that faith begins where logic fails.