Imagination

Please ignore the English and stay focused on the content.

Did God as a spiritual entity took a physical form to become God for us or did we as physical beings evolved enough to understand the need of spirituality to create God to evolve further? No one can tell you anything about God one hundred percent and we unfortunately started to use God, for the power to control the unsuspecting population for our political convenience?
If you ask this question to a religious person the defense mechanism would kick in, they would not let anyone, to be asking anything about God, because they believe that God is in need to be believed blindly. Immediately you would be put down, for your asking and doubting the holly books thus be labeled as a non-believer.
If you ask this to an atheist he /she would response with total certainty that there is no God. My question is to both sides that how can you answer this question with so much passion? Yet with the limited use of your constantly evolving brain powers. Even just because of that your answers can’t be without the assumptions.

If these egotistic assumptions are mixed with the human passion everyone becomes louder and aggressive enough to kill and get killed over assumptions. Religions have been doing this for thousands of years, yet interestingly, at the same time they have the teachings of compassion. It just does not make sense to me, especially when I see people killing each other over their opinions. Whether God exists or not, whether we understand God or not, still it is not worth taking someone’s rights to live, not only it is illegal it is a spiritual crime as well. What if you are on the receiving end, remember the golden rule of the spirituality, don’t do to anyone what you don’t like done to you. If religion is touching you in such a way that you feel passionate about it, just add com before your passion, hopefully you will be able to see what I am trying to show.

If you show the Harry Potter to a religious person they would freak out to discredit the stories like that, yet value the religious stories passionately, but an atheist would have total rejection with an explanations, that, how the special effects can be used to create such movies to be convincing, from Werewolf to Dracula to Chinese dragons and Witches to black and white magic, a few to talk about.
BUT
Right now I want to talk about the creator’s active human imagination.
Imagination has helped the human beings to evolve and excel in all departments of life because it enables us to see the future scenarios and out comes of our decisions.
From science and technology to medicine to all kind of inventions and yes even in religions, like pope is opening up and being accepting to the new and changing times, he may be is able to see the empty church buildings and eventually collapsing of the religion itself.
Still it is not common, to connect our imagination to our problems at individual level, like robbing our own happiness and contentment out of our own yet mortal life, to creating all sort of stress related physical, mental and emotional health problems just imagining the out comes and imaginary scenarios as if we don’t have our real problems to face.

First of all the out comes of the decisions are residing on the horizons and they are not present in present, second they are not materialized yet. For instance you go to school to become a doctor, if everything goes according to the plan things may turn out according to the plan, but in most cases not everyone becomes whatever they want to be.
Envisioning, desiring and planning, yet not succeeding, is a lot more common than achieving whatever we want to. The society and parent may teach that, to the kids to raise their self-esteem and confidence, but in reality the proof is in the pudding, just look around, do the kids become whatever they want to. If that was true there would be a lot more rock stars then we have. Why there are not only doctors and lawyers? Who are these people whom become plumbers construction workers or night cleaners, especially if these professions are not desired by the kids.

I hope eventually we will connect the dots clearly, as we advance in our medicine, because I believe, that the way we think and believe, has a lot to do with the type of disease we develop or die off. Say someone swears at you with a smile, in a language you don’t understand, you would not have any kind of physical response other than the confusion, but if you understand what was said, you may process it, and within seconds you will respond with anger. The process of physically getting angry came from a thought process thus the feelings depend on the thoughts, and if you can control the thought you hopefully and I say it again hopefully can control the feelings. With that we can override a lot of genetics related problems by not feeding them.
If you become passionate about your existing knowledge regardless of the field, you want everyone else to follow, or at least think like you, but when you start to disrespect others over it, even as an atheist, you already have claimed that you somehow are better than others, which puts you in the zone of prejudiced. This is the foundation of prejudiced, when you have been installed this knowledge from the get go, you would never be able to see God living in the people, especially when they are from the opposing group. You are taught to see the opposing groups as the Devils or the followers of the Devil but yourself as good people thus in God’s good book.
If you are a bad CEO or spiritually inept, you just can’t see beyond the politics of your belonging group to judge, that a good deed is a good deed whether it is coming from a belonging group or opposing group. If you can’t see the Godly things done by the Godless people you are too far into the religious politics and even much further from the real spirituality.

If you are passionate about your religion being right, for two thousand or fifteen hundred years. How are you going to acknowledge and describe the progress and evolution made possible by the Godless people? Especially when you claim that even a leaf on the tree can’t move without the God’s will. If a leaf can’t move without the will of God, why can’t you believe that there is a will of God involved, which helps the Godless people to help humanity evolve. Thus they should be respected just as much as a religious individual, that alone can help to, not only work against prejudiced but also to help you to become aware of spirituality beyond the boundaries of your belonging religion.
If the progress and evolution is the will of God then why do you stand against it, or hell bent to destroy it. If you are trying to bring the day of judgment, described in the holly books, why don’t you come out and say so, and the most important question is that why would you destroy and kill the innocents to claim a spot in the heaven? and how can you even think that you would be able to get there with the innocent blood in your hands. Heaven is a zone opposite to hell, if you create hell for the innocents to go to heaven, you have been watching too many Harry potter movies and believing in them.
The reality is that as an individual we all have been granted or blessed with the free will and compassion from before birth, these two you don’t learn, growing up you bring along as you start to exist physically. With free will there will always be a choice. If you force others to follow, what you think is right it is one hundred percent politics and nothing but, and yes even if it is coming from the politics of your religion. Religion becomes a political system when it is forced, and most religions are guilty of that, so where did the spirituality go? I think it took a refuge in the Godless people that is why democrats and liberals talk about the practically spiritual things, but conservatives regardless of going to church stand against the spirituality driven morality, like taxes to use for the poor and provide universal health care. A compassionate individual would gladly give to help people in need.

I can describe the extreme capitalism this way.
Say there is a big monkey in the bush he claims a tree full of fruit as his, if anyone comes close to it gets beaten up of worse, so in reality he can’t eat all the fruit but would not allow the others to even come close to the tree because of the security so the fruit rots. Unfortunately this one big monkey is not alone, so there is a whole lot of fruit goes to rot. As human beings we have the knowledge of our mortality so we all feel insecure thus we try to secure ourselves with our belongings, but our insecurities can take us to extreme, which makes us to hoard as if we are going to live forever. History shows that Egyptians and Chinese took their belonging stuff to their graves. Sure you can leave it behind for your loved ones, but doesn’t it go against the very arguments commonly made by the people whom are against the welfare states and universal health care. They believe if you help people they become lazy and dependent, yet with expectations. To a point they have a legitimate concern but still it is not an excuse to hoard. There was a guy named Thompson in Toronto, when he died he left billions of dollars behind yet he lived moderately, he lived in an older house and was very exited to tell his friend that he bought a freezer full of hot dogs on sale. My point is not that you live your life recklessly or hoard to the max, my point is, that for you to be able to see the causes of hunger or related sufferings so you can use your compassion to help the ones you think that its their fault to be poor or facing that suffering from hunger. If you think that everything in your life has been and is done by you and you alone, you got to think again about it, because everything you have done, was dependent on the oxygen you have been breathing in, yet you have absolutely no control over it.

Being alive is being blessed, so we all need to reciprocate in return for these blessings. You can choose not to, but you still owe it to yourself to know the purpose of a human’s life.

Human individual is like a cell in the living body, who gets life nourishments from the functioning of the body but it works for it as well. When you say it is not my problem, spiritually speaking it is, because if everyone or all human beings think and adopt that philosophy the mothers would not take care of their babies. The governments would collect the taxes without providing any help in return. No one would care to live in that kind of society. How far do you want to go to challenge the responsibilities of reciprocation. If you expect to be safe from the suffering people it is a wise idea to help and reciprocate. If every big monkey is allowed to keep the food, even if rots then the community has the responsibility to provide the food to hungry as well. The potential chaos like hungry getting together and killing the big monkeys is a good possibility, so the balance is needed. The government has to find the rules to be fare to all. To protect your rights to have a tree to yourself but feed the hungry as well, the government alone can’t do it because the government is consistent of people, people like you and me.

You can put it down as socialism, but this is as spiritual as it gets, when and if you, yourself start to see the hungry and the rotting food. This has nothing to do with the tax system but everything to do with your spirituality. If you look at the people voting against this spirituality driven human efforts, they are usually the church goers and religious otherwise.

The biggest example is the Arab nations neighboring the starving nations suffering from the water shortage thus starvation and death. This day and age, pipelines for oil but not for water is completely political. A very non spiritual yet these countries follow the religion Islam which openly says, “if your neighbor sleeps hungry your food is not kosher for you”. Humanity can’t be healthy in a system of dog eat dog. If we are alive with the free oxygen we owe our life to the provider and we need to do some reciprocation in return. This is why spiritually we need to help the less fortunate we are above being a monkey whom can’t use his imagination to see the rotting food.
I am against the communism and socialism as well because they still give powers to some elite individuals, just like the religions, so what I stand for, is, that a justice system with equal human rights, compassion and respect, if an individual or an entity commits an unjust action they should be punished by the law and yes even if it is the governing party. If as a community you expect the individual to follow the rules, the community should  make sure that it is not guilty of, not providing the basic necessities to the individual.
In politics everything goes, so its not, that the opposing groups, or even the people in your own family, community, nation or religion are wrong. It is you, who is wrong if you are passionately charged with a limited use of your brain power. When or if you are able to use one hundred percent of your brain power, then and only then you can’t learn new things anymore. You can only say, you are one hundred percent right with the use of one hundred percent brain power not just because your religions say so. You as an individual come with the shoulders to take spiritual responsibilities to be a working horse for God directly not to follow your belonging groups political agenda.
Our wars and extreme related killings have been going on for a very long time, and if they are still going on, you should know what it means? It means that there is a segment of population, which has always, and still believes in, that they are one hundred percent right, even the life is evolving in all other departments right before their eyes.
If one believes that he/she has the right to kill the non believers, then non believers should have the right to defend and protect him/herself, so all the wars and conflicts of humanity are related with the revenge related love loss and passionate extreme belief to be right.
If you look in the history people even kill to prevent the loss of power, like the killing the children of the opposing kings or opposing groups. Politics puts different masks, even Godly mask to act Devilish. Just look around you would not have to go far to find politics related extreme. The trouble is that the deeper you are in the extreme, further you are from the personal choices. Yet God has granted you the free will and compassion from before birth.
If God is a desert and a human being is a piece of sand, it may appear to be very insignificant but it is you, who is making things happened physically. The desert, stays as a desert, useless and infertile unless physicality of the human being is involved. One piece of sand is the foundation of all the microscopic changes to make all the good deeds or spiritual things of humanity, yet with a choice. Does God plays a role in it? For sure remember without the oxygen all human cells die and when the body works as a whole then and only then the cells receive the oxygen to live and let the body live. You just can’t separate one from the other to function.
No one wants to be unproductive while alive, not even God. That is why the progress and evolution is constant regardless of, whether you believe in God or not. As long as you are a living human being and you are helping to do God’s work, no one should disrespect you, not even God himself, because if everybody is dead God is a fruitless and useless desert. You may believe in the heaven and hell but you can’t feel superior just because of that alone.
There would always be an area or a zone, where we need to have a belief system, to have hope and optimism  you have to have an active imagination, because the hope and optimism’s building is founded on the positive imagination. It is powerful enough to make of break one’s happiness and contentment, heal or make sick, just like the placebo effects. You can’t prove it, yet it is a reality, but if you believe in it to the point that you kill all others whom don’t believe in it the way you do, you are trying to use the placebo as the real medicine. Which has a success rate but with a low percentage. When it comes to yourself or your family you would not want to use it. Would you? To end it I would say we never should use our imagination for its negative effects, because if a child can have night meres what does it do to that child when he/she is grown up with that active imagination negatively speaking, he/she would rob his/her own happiness and contentment out of a mortal life, that is the biggest loss one can have . Positively speaking there are no limits to the human individual unless he/she creates them from the imagination.