Our belonging groups have been preaching to us to live as part of the group, be loyal, and fight others if the group goes to war against other human beings. Killing other human beings for belonging groups has been, is, and will always be a sin for a long time to come. I have been using a term called ‘dead dog’ for a long time; a dead dog is the cause of the problem. Personally, whenever I look for the cause of humanity’s major problems, I always end up and stop at prejudice and discrimination. I call them the original sins because they can be found all over humanity. From individuals to collective groups, we have all been guilty of them. Some discriminate by color, some by gender, some by status, and some suffer from nationalism and religious biases. I emphasize ‘suffering’ because as human beings, we all suffer from our problems caused by our original sins. We often don’t even realize our sins because they are passed down to us by our families, communities, nations, and religions. All of them are authorities to us because we are born into them. Personally, I believe humanity is still not taking these dead dogs seriously enough and is not putting in enough effort to remove them. If you have been reading my blog for a while, you are already familiar with my dead dog story, but if you are new to it, I think you need to know it first before we go any further.
There once was a community that dug a well for water and lived around it. One day, a dog fell into it and died. When the water started to stink, everyone became worried. They gathered together, and one of them went down into the well to investigate. He found a dead dog and yelled from the well, ‘There is a dead dog in here!’ People looked at the mayor with questioning eyes. He said, ‘Take out about fifty barrels of water and then start using it, but make sure you remove the dead dog first.’
Today, we live in a world that continues to function without removing the dead dog, so we have several dead dogs in our wells. From medicine to social systems, everyone is looking for band-aid solutions to buy time, which can be fine, but as humanity, we should understand the causes and solutions to our problems.
If you have a headache, you take an aspirin, regardless of the reason. Our problems persist and evolve into major issues in our lives, from health problems to local social issues to international conflicts. We have developed an attitude of sweeping everything under the rug and continuing on, hoping that one day the problems will resolve themselves or that we can leave them for future generations. There is nothing inherently wrong with this approach for some, but for me, problems do not go away on their own; we have to take action.
Some may believe that God will intervene, but to me, humanity is more responsible for its issues than we are taught to believe. God has done a godly job or is still doing so by providing us with a living, breathing, thinking body and spirit. God is still taking care of bigger things, like ensuring that space does not collapse on us, whether internally or externally, or dealing with things over which we have no control as human beings. As humanity, we must work towards removing the dead dogs from our personal and communal wells.
Since our propensity to kill each other starts with the education of prejudice and discrimination, I refer to prejudice and discrimination as the original sin or dead dog. Any problem that can span or give birth to bigger problems for humanity is an original sin. Our prejudice and discrimination against others has been, is, and will continue to give birth to future problems.
Currently, Americans are protecting their citizens from prosecution by the International Criminal Court. Automatically, you might believe there is nothing wrong with this; it feels natural if you strongly believe in the politics of belonging to your group. To me, the sense of belonging is the dead dog of prejudice and discrimination, and prejudice and discrimination are the dead dogs of most of humanity’s problems.
Discrediting or penalizing the International Criminal Court is a clear sign that our politics of belonging to our groups is strong and still out of control.
Humanity is already divided enough to engage in such open rhetoric, but our politics of belonging is so powerful that even our educated people are blind to its consequences. Not speaking out against prejudice and discrimination is one thing; putting hurdles in the way of humanity’s evolution is another. Naturally, it is in human DNA to evolve; God and religion aside, this process will not stop. Therefore, anything done to unite humanity belongs to our evolutionary nature; putting hurdles in the way is purely political, aimed at maintaining power for a group of people.
Our civilized nations should participate in combating our upcoming problems, not fueling further divisions. The general population of groups is usually inspired by their leaders’ politically charged speeches about belonging, believing they are superior in the world or in humanity. Despite our progress and civilization, we are still entrenched in old group politics, yet nature continues to call us to evolve and work together as humanity.
Ignoring humanity’s needs is plain ignorant and unwise, but our politics of group belonging overrides even the most logically sound and scientifically backed explanations. There is always a segment of people among us who resist even the most beneficial technologies. From blood transfusions to test tubes to stem cell research, conservatives have historically resisted these advancements, yet these same resistors have a history of embracing new technologies when it suits them; remember, they were the ones who once threw virgins off cliffs to appease God.
Nevertheless, humanity is evolving in all areas of life. The popularity of equal human rights is a clear sign that humanity is about to take the next step towards joining hands as one entity.
Our older generations are losing their grip on what they have always believed in; these contractions are signs that new changes are being born. Not long ago, racism and slavery were not only accepted but also a way of life not openly questioned. Today, a racist or slave owner would be scorned and punished by most human societies. We have evolved to the point where as individuals, being labeled racist would be embarrassing.
Being prejudiced or discriminatory is now recognized and becoming criminalized in most societies. To me, it is an original sin that most of us do not pay attention to because it is often preached even by our nations and religions.
If it were up to proponents of division, they would work against every intellectual effort to unite humanity. Just look around and see how our politics of group belonging is damaging our evolution and civilization. We have spent more resources on killing each other than on solving humanity’s real problems. If people were not fighting each other, what would the financial state of humanity be today? If the ‘dog-eat-dog’ philosophy had not been carried on from our primitive times, where would the world be spiritually?
If you do not believe in God and are against religious extremism, I would not try to convince you otherwise, but I would encourage you to take responsibility for your actions, just as I do for religious people as well.
If you are Muslim and find spiritual fulfillment in visiting someone’s tomb, I would not oppose it, even though I believe we should not own land after death, while many living human beings are homeless. We should all be buried to become recycled material for nature, benefiting future generations, regardless of our importance in life.
If you believe in beating your chest or self-flagellation for spiritual reasons, I would not oppose your spiritual satisfaction, but I would suggest that if your blood is needed to save someone’s life, you should donate it rather than waste it.
If you live in the far north where daylight or sun makes prayer and fasting hazardous to your health, I still would not oppose your spiritual fulfillment, but I would suggest adjusting your prayer and fasting times to those of the equator, so you do not suffer physically while trying to fulfill yourself spiritually.
If you do not believe in God and are fully committed to scientific knowledge, you can still find spiritual satisfaction in accepting the incompleteness of human knowledge and striving for humility. For a mortal being, spiritual satisfaction is not a trivial matter. With any belief system, being alive as a mortal is not a losing battle; it’s about understanding reciprocity, which helps us achieve inner peace. Otherwise, trying to control everything takes its toll by robbing you of happiness and contentment.
Our inherited and divisive political knowledge is the cause of our current problems. Therefore, working together as one humanity, with equal human rights, can help us achieve not only inner peace but also outer and elusive peace. Our problem lies in following politically tainted religious knowledge of our groups and believing it to be God’s word.
Power has the ability to corrupt us individually and collectively, leading us to desire our race or religion to dominate the world, much like empires of the past. Unfortunately, even our history shows countless religions and a graveyard of empires, yet we still fail to learn from our mistakes. While some kingdoms still exist, humanity has evolved enough to understand the importance of equal human rights. Personally, I believe the days of these remaining kingdoms are numbered.
A crime is still a crime, regardless of who commits it. Prince Andrew is implicated in sex crimes and may be proven guilty. Powerful people cannot escape the criminal justice system; even police officers who commit crimes can be penalized. Therefore, Prince Andrew as an individual, the police as an organization, and American unrest as a nation are all signs of humanity evolving and undergoing painful contractions to give birth to something entirely new. Since the water has already broken, there is no way racism, prejudice, and discrimination-based politics can survive the birth of equal human rights. Even religions have taken a hit; the Pope has deviated from long-held beliefs of prejudice and discrimination, stating, ‘Who am I to judge?'”
We must establish equal human rights globally; otherwise, it will not work because we need a global rule of law. An international criminal justice system is crucial for an effective United Nations. We need a stronger, democratically governed, and united United Nations, along with an equally powerful International Criminal Court. The idea of blind justice implies freedom from politics.
Just look around and see what’s happening these days. Even the bastions of democracy rejecting the International Criminal Court clearly indicate their reluctance to face future repercussions, akin to what religions experienced.
The real picture of the controversial International Criminal Court underscores humanity’s current imperative to collaborate. While we possess the capability and intellect, we hesitate to take progressive steps. The necessity for international systems has been evident, but their success has encountered numerous obstacles, even from well-established democracies.
Real issues like global warming, infectious diseases, and cybercrimes, such as international phone scams originating from India, underscore the need for global systems. Despite our civilization, why can’t we unite as one humanity? Our primary obstacle is the politics of group identity. Even educated individuals struggle to embrace global systems due to entrenched group identities.
For instance, our long-standing United Nations employs a veto system, which logically contradicts democratic principles. If advanced nations aren’t treated equally, the system becomes politically skewed, eroding blind trust. This situation is evident in the challenges facing the International Criminal Court.
I believe in pure spirituality and a politics-free justice system. Introducing politics into these spheres dilutes their essence. The politicization of group identities has turned everything political, tarnishing the respect accorded to religions in recent history. If we’re not careful, our justice system’s respectability will suffer next.
Our terrorists already dismiss Western court systems as illegitimate; soon, every nation may view each other’s courts similarly. Law and order should be impartial. Whether it’s an individual, a gang, a community, a nation, or a religious group committing a crime, higher authorities must scrutinize them. As humans, we should all be accountable to a respected higher authority. By now, humanity should have evolved enough to implement equal human rights globally. Yet, even in our well-established democracies, achieving this remains a struggle. Despite popular support and pressing global needs, our groups resist joining international efforts. They fear losing their identity, relevance, and status, refusing to adapt.
A crime is a crime, regardless of the perpetrator. Politics poisons our justice systems. If we hold individuals accountable for crimes, it’s logical to hold groups accountable as well. Why should it be different for nations or religions? According to equal human rights, each individual should be equal to a group, irrespective of size, especially concerning blind justice.
Since justice and spirituality are intertwined, they should remain free from political influence. Human insecurities linked to group identity are so ingrained that even otherwise honest and spiritual individuals turn a blind eye to political truths. If you set ethical standards for others, you must exemplify them first. Equal human rights are widely accepted and indisputable. Yet, every group openly practices prejudice and discrimination in nationalist and religious politics.
Today’s reality demands attention, echoing loudly worldwide for equal human rights, regardless of location, identity, or affiliation. Outdated group politics persists, threatening to drag humanity back into the Dark Ages, as prophesied in our sacred texts.
To avoid this fate, combat global warming, nuclear warfare, and biological threats, we must individually advocate for one humanity’s cause. If we fail to evolve and unite, humanity will remain divided, treating each other as inferior beings, squandering resources on internecine conflicts instead of combating real crises like infectious diseases, global warming, poverty, and health emergencies.
As social creatures, humans naturally gravitate towards one another, valuing essentials like oxygen, water, food, shelter, health, love, freedom, and security. Our innate needs compel us to coexist peacefully, trusting in our governing systems. Our greatest challenge lies in recognizing our commonalities amid our differences. Critically, most crimes are committed by our own kind, regardless of where we live, undermining our collective security.
Our individual mortality teaches us all of the above, yet somehow, we often ignore the messages from beyond. A dying human does not need resources; instead, they need love and care. They can and do leave their unneeded assets to the coming generation. This raises a question: if the next generation moves on to value something different from what previous generations held dear, or if those values are no longer relevant, not only does the individual die but the community dies with them as well.
Unfortunately, our politics of belonging often overrides our logical thinking about mortality. If more people die than are born in a community and the community fails to address looming future problems, if people don’t work to pay taxes for communal support, problems don’t just vanish; they are created. Running a business is not akin to running a country, so passionate individuals can sometimes cause more harm to a community than they can help. Hence, politics alone cannot sustain a successful nation.
A significant component of a happy and successful nation is spirituality-based principles, and no, you don’t need a religion-based governing system to uphold spiritual values. Politically, some criticize spiritual values as socialism to intimidate people, yet when examining the happiness rankings of nations, cutthroat competitive nations do not rank higher. Socialism becomes problematic when it contradicts equal human rights. Treating individuals equally, whether compared to corporations, nations, or religions, is spiritually correct, enhancing both individual happiness and communal values.
From advocating for equal human rights to establishing welfare systems, from ensuring access to education to providing universal healthcare, these rights embody the hallmarks of spirituality-based principles, yet politically, they are often associated with socialism. Interestingly, they contribute to community thriving and higher placement in the happiness scale of nations.
If other creatures can be trained and tamed with love, it suggests that human beings themselves have been tamed by love. Raising a child without love leads not only to individual but also communal problems, so blame should not solely rest on the child and their parents but should be shared by the community. This is evident in national crime rates; a caring community should ideally exhibit lower crime rates over time, whereas in fiercely competitive environments, jails are often overcrowded.
The concept of a “love triangle” provides perspective, as love humanizes us. Humans, as spiritual beings, are surrounded by love from all directions to maintain spiritual balance. If deprived of any aspect of love, there is potential for humans to behave like beasts, even towards their own kind—a state contrary to human desires.
A cunning and intelligent animal can be more dangerous than a predictable hungry creature, so if our capacity to love is diminished, we can kill and be killed without remorse. This underscores the importance of raising children with love, surrounding their inner beings with affection, as a human being is meant to embody a sphere of love.
For whatever reason—whether due to a loss of instinctual love, erosion of passionate love, or even hurt from a loss of universal love—it can potentially transform a loving individual into a dangerously intelligent animal. This transformation can be particularly profound if love is lost at a tender age, potentially turning all of us into defensive creatures. Intriguingly, humans are among the most dangerous creatures due to our intelligence and literal weaponry.
As social creatures, we reside in societies where healthy and balanced individuals are crucial for creating healthy societies. Without love, trust is the first casualty; without trust, there can be no relationship or sacrifice for others, thereby diminishing compassion. Our physical, mental, emotional, and spiritual well-being as human beings hinges on established trust; lacking it, we can suffer both individually and collectively.
An education system that promotes dog-eat-dog self-preservation may have been suitable in our primitive history but in today’s societies, it can be viewed as an animalistic trait of human beings. Such systems potentially foster discrimination based on factors such as color, gender, nationality, or religion, and may even perpetuate reverse racism. This represents a serious flaw within our community education systems.
From parents to communities, nations, and religions, they all discuss compassion-related virtues and the challenges faced by humanity, often deflecting blame away from their flawed education on prejudice and discrimination. Few are willing to critically examine their own education systems, which are influenced by exclusive group affiliations.
If a religion preaches a specific way of life exclusively for its followers, it is outright prejudiced and discriminatory towards others, including its own members who don’t adhere to those rules. When disputes arise, they not only show willingness but actually strip each other of love, a quality that distinguishes humans from animals, thus reducing even reasonably evolved individuals to a primal state.
Acting on behalf of their groups to deprive others of love has been a widespread practice across all human groups, possibly stemming from their own experiences of love loss. Being deprived of love may be the foundational cause of, and connected to, humanity’s perpetual conflicts.
Individuals who exploit God for political agendas mistakenly turn otherwise peaceful and loving human beings into aggressive creatures. While they may believe they are following religious directives, they neglect the compassion advocated by all religions, thereby denying themselves true spiritual fulfillment. Religious practice can be spiritual, but understanding the distinction between politics and spirituality is crucial—akin to assuming the role of a CEO in one’s spiritual journey.
A logical question arises: why would God exclusively revert to a spiritual form? It makes no sense for God to retreat to mere irrelevance, akin to beauty in the forest. God’s physical existence and the fulfillment of ordinary human prayers depend on living, breathing human beings; therefore, logically, God cannot be intent on destroying humanity. The freedom of individual human will is what drives conflicts and wars, as each person has the choice to engage in such actions.
Since we are blessed with free will and understand how to wield it, we inherently know it comes with a package deal. We can either benefit from it or harm others and ourselves in the process. The key lies in understanding why we choose as we do—a journey that begins with taking the reins as CEO of our own lives.
To delve deeper, we must acknowledge our evolutionary nature, still entangled in the politics of group belonging, struggling to unite as a single humanity. What drives our evolutionary potential, boundless and adaptable? Answers remain tentative amidst our evolving understanding.
Now is the time for us to grasp our individual significance on a grand scale and embrace the uncertainties of humanity’s unfolding future without succumbing to fear. We must boldly step forward, envisioning a future where the primacy of religion, nationalism, racism, gender, or sexual biases diminishes, while the importance of God, the individual, and spirituality ascends.
As Rumi eloquently posited, God’s intent for humanity was to create an ocean within each of us, not to drown as insignificant drops in a vast sea. The politics of group identity, stripping individuals of their worth, cannot stem from God; if not divine, where does it originate? The answer lies with those who manipulate God and people for their political agendas—ordinary humans like us.
Endowed with the atom of autonomy, we possess free will, compassion, a personal sense of justice, and the capacity for guilt. The true existential threat lies not in an external God, but in the internal turmoil within ourselves. Fearing a distant God while ignoring the divinity within can lead to spiritual transgressions, even amid one’s living years.
Consider the testimony of a war-weary veteran: individually, we possess the power not only to deprive ourselves of happiness and contentment but also to harm ourselves. Understanding our personal makeup is imperative for each individual.
Navigating a dog-eat-dog world as spiritual beings housed in physical bodies presents a profound challenge. Ultimately, our free will imposes immense responsibilities upon us. Negotiating a world dominated by group identities can transform even the most resilient individuals into compliant sheep, herded by political agendas. We must critique not only others but also ourselves, harnessing this godlike ability to scrutinize our actions before they unfold.
Every society maintains a criminal justice system in accordance with its constitution, yet rapidly evolving societies struggle to meet contemporary demands, especially when hindered by conservative forces impeding progress. Lagging or opposing societal needs can render their justice systems prejudiced, discriminatory, or outright unjust.
Even in modern societies, biases and prejudices—both traditional and customary—persist as daily norms. A critical self-examination often reveals such biases thriving in our own communities.
Our predicament lies in the rarity of self-critique among those infected with the politics of group belonging. For passionately committed individuals, group allegiance seems infallible, leading many to remain silent even when their groups err or commit original sins.
Conversely, speaking out can result in hatred, threats, and harsh treatment from these groups. From ostracism to death, such extreme social injustices remain overshadowed by the cacophony of group politics. From nationalism to religious and cultural extremes, dissenting opinions are not merely voiced but shouted, drowning out individual voices regardless of their validity.
To me, if adhering to religious traditions, rules, rituals, or prayers makes one feel superior to those who don’t, or to opposing groups, it risks fostering prejudice and discrimination. This phenomenon constitutes an original sin—a departure from spirituality into the realm where one believes they are doing good while judging others as inferior. This path contradicts modern trends like equal human rights.
All people are vessels of one God, much like cells are integral to our bodies. No single cell can claim superiority; each serves to preserve the body’s integrity while alive. Similarly, we are part of God’s body, where those perceived as inferior may prove superior in character. If religious teachings breed prejudice and discrimination, distinguishing between religion and spirituality becomes crucial. Learning to prioritize spirituality over religious affiliation fosters humility, especially given historical issues with religious extremism.
Remaining within your birth religion while shedding the politics of group belonging leads to a spiritual realm. Most religions espouse spirituality but struggle to divorce it from their political agendas, tainting their spiritual systems. A politically tainted spiritual system remains tainted, regardless of religious reverence. Thus, respecting one’s religion should never justify killing others—a consequence of politics, not spirituality.
In the quiet of night, shedding each bestowed identity unveils the true self. This introspection reveals our shared essence amid politically influenced differences. All political maneuvers aim to fortify and secure group belonging, stemming from insecurity, mistrust, and faltering personal beliefs. Regardless of feelings or assertions, examining personal life with logical scrutiny reveals irrefutable truths.
Consider that you emerged against odds of one in four hundred million, developing from a cell invisible to the naked eye. You arose from seemingly nothing, sustained by the same air that feeds your ten trillion cells and hundred trillion bacteria, enabling your existence. If you still believe this all occurs solely by your will and intent, perhaps it’s time to face reality with a clear mind.
The reality ahead is clear: you will grow old and eventually die. Knowing this should foster appreciation for your living years with humility, yet many strive to control and secure even their mortality. Viewing life as a mountain, they climb solely to secure, missing the scenery and journey, only to fall. No matter how high you climb, security remains elusive; the fact of mortality persists.
Genghis Khan consumed silver to safeguard himself, only to die with a blue hue. Our efforts to preserve often yield side effects that compromise our health—physical, mental, emotional, and spiritual health intertwined with our souls. Even our thoughts may impact our expiration dates. Health is vital for accumulating genuine rewards: reciprocity, happiness, and contentment. Yet both extremes—living solely in sacrifice as religions advocate, or obsessively securing material gains—fail the mortal condition.
Reciprocity resonates with a spiritual belief system; without it, climbing, hoarding, and consuming every moment to secure oneself leads to stress and leaving all behind. It’s a choice—whether in life’s living years or beyond, I’d rather relish the visit while fulfilling my duties.
Whether heaven, hell, God, or Devil exists or not, I focus on this life, as an atom of autonomy within. Doing justice to all, including myself, defines my path. Others may choose differently, but enforcing personal beliefs on me invites my dissent. As we evolve, we must embrace learning, unshackling from millennia-old systems; human knowledge remains unfinished, open to amendments and adaptations to the times.
Doctors prescribe medications to heal, yet some succumb to side effects—like Genghis Khan and his silver. While drugs are lifelines, perpetual use challenges quality of life, emphasizing the imperative of quality over quantity.
Fear and control consume us, jeopardizing health and happiness; without these, measuring success in mortal life is futile. Climbing life’s mountain impresses others but means little if personal happiness and health falter.
Those sacrificing happiness for material gain often lose hope and optimism, aging fearfully, seeking solace in group affiliations. Ironically, crimes against peers within these groups persist despite religious teachings. Original sins—prejudice and discrimination—remain ingrained, perpetuating societal woes despite harsh religious penalties.
Observe firsthand: religions, while punishing crimes, don’t guarantee crime-free societies; instead, they foster original sins.
How do we mend and resolve problems solely through political truces and ceasefires without addressing the root issues of original sins? Peace must begin at the individual level; those seeking healing must start with themselves. Sometimes, compromise may feel like betrayal to loved ones, but evolution demands a price. Our personal evolution is key to both internal and external peace. If our education system obstructs this evolution, we must adapt with the times.
Today, the tide is rising with the aid of the internet, ushering in a new era for humanity and human rights. A global village emphasizing equal human rights should supersede extreme nationalism, while spirituality should replace the political exploitation of religions. While we respect religions, granting them tax-free status, this respect should be solely for their spiritual fulfillment, not when they intertwine with the politics of belonging.
If you seek causes to champion, begin with equal human rights—a profoundly spiritual and vital cause for humanity, combating original sins. Hunger, poverty, and universal healthcare for all are additional causes, for unlike other creatures, our dog-eat-dog philosophy reflects our animal instincts from ancient times. Our spiritual essence compels us to live not as mere creatures, but as spiritual or godly entities; therefore, exclusive physical living does not fulfill our spiritual potential.
Religions often preach goodness and helpfulness, yet they frequently align with conservative political platforms, contradicting the spiritual values promoted by democratic political parties. As we evolve, unbiased knowledge across all facets of existence becomes essential. If your political affiliation promotes a dog-eat-dog philosophy, it falls upon you to align your personal life with your spiritual values.
If your principles clash with political parties, evolve spiritually and align with whichever promotes spiritual values, as they too will evolve over time. Despite religious differences, humanity progresses with spiritual values; witness the global push for equal human rights. While our need for group belonging persists, the new era demands a shift from old problem-solving methods. Imperfect as it may be, the United Nations endures due to its advocacy for equal human rights, offering a path beyond group politics to embrace humanity as a whole.
Whether viewed scientifically or through staunch religious belief, remember: you are human first. Before passing judgment, engage your personal sense of justice, which transcends group politics. It’s not solely about science or religion, but about embracing your entirety as a human being. Ask yourself: are you a puppet whose strings are pulled by political or religious leaders, or are you the CEO of your own life? Use your innate sense of justice, common sense, and decency—treat others as you wish to be treated or as you would treat your loved ones.
Today, spirituality and equal human rights embody decency and are challenging to uphold even during peaceful times. In times of war, when love is scarce, humanity loses its spiritual essence, allowing ordinary individuals to revert to animalistic behaviors, endorsed by groups against opposing factions—making the international criminal court contentious. Our global political disputes underscore pervasive prejudice and discrimination.
I once watched a documentary where a terrorist educated young students, asserting that early indoctrination molds them—reminiscent of Roman Catholic nuns’ attempts to convert Native children. Strangely, this links to individuals’ unbridled sense of belonging to their groups. If religious groups have long recognized this, why can’t individuals see or comprehend group political strategies? Despite claiming to be evolved, we still see attempts to brainwash others for group allegiance. Religions persistently preach their path to God, exacerbating societal divides and perpetuating war crimes.
Humanity continues to suffer due to divisive politics and social ills, including war crimes. Thus, opposing international courts implies readiness for future war crimes. Every republic aspires to empirehood, while weaker individuals seek refuge under a stronger entity, even at the expense of their spiritual values. A spiritually evolved individual, also the CEO of their life, advocates for equal human rights, an effective United Nations, and an international criminal court—rejecting group politics that compromise personal spiritual values and sense of justice.
If you believe dominance by your group would bring peace to humanity, history has proven otherwise. Races, nations, empires, and religions have failed to unite humanity over millennia. Equal human rights resonate because they address individual concerns, dismantling prejudice and discrimination. By eradicating these, you’ll find clarity in your convictions.
